|
|
 |
| Advertisement
|
By Victoria Berry ComputerWorld
Canada
The phrase "user friendly" may be overused,
but it is one that continues to apply, especially as the
concept becomes central to the growth of business
intelligence.
Gone are the days when BI was the terrain
dominated solely by high-tech analysts and power users.
Vendors and enterprises today want the casual and business
users to get on board.
Reporting and querying tools are
finding their way onto desktops across the enterprise — not
the least of which are those of executives.
This move
has helped take the pressure of "small r" reporting off the
shoulders of IT and power users and has instead allowed an
organization’s executives and other users to create their own
reports, and do a little drilling down on their
own.
Norman Mackay, director of business intelligence
for Fujitsu Consulting Canada in Calgary, noted that over the
last couple of years, as BI has become more mainstream as a
way of solving problems and gained acceptance in the
enterprise, there has been an upswing in BI-related tools as
well. Performance monitoring, scorecarding, business process
monitoring and more powerful dashboarding have catapulted BI
into the hearts and minds of executives.
"Before, the
director or vp would go to analysts and say, ‘Give me this
report.’ Now they have the information at their fingertips,"
Mackay said, adding that in more progressive organizations
executives want the information immediately and get it for
themselves.
Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) is one
organization that is trying to get to that level of
progressiveness. Michael Clarke, manager of corporate and data
management for the Calgary-based company, said the railway is
trying to establish an environment where end users can do
fairly simple things themselves.
The company has been
working with Business Objects on a client server version to
get people to use data more effectively.
"That means
producing a basic report or even taking a canned report that
shows key information and drilling down into the details when
they want to see root causes," Clarke said.
CPR
supports early adopters as much as possible. The new breed of
business analysts who are trying to solve business problems,
but also take the time to learn the technology, always give
back exceptional results to the company, Clarke said. "They
are the best leverage for this information environment that we
have by far, and they produce some really amazing things. So
when we find one of those guys, we really support them and
trumpet their results." This leads others in the company to
use the system too.
Tom Obright, director of
information management for Ottawa-based Scouts Canada, said
the organization is using a Databeacon BI solution to help get
data into people’s hands. Scouts Canada had been running
several different systems, each controlled by a regional or
provincial council, so information was not being shared
quickly enough. Obright noted that every September the Scouts
would start its membership profiling, but the head office
would not have numbers from the regional councils until March
or even as late as August — which was no help in being
proactive about increasing membership and volunteer
numbers.
Using Siebel’s Web functionality, and having
people centralize their data with Databeacon, has allowed
councils to share information and strategies.
"In a
youth service environment, analytics have not been the primary
benchmark of success," Obright said. "So we’ve been trying to
work with people who see the potential and see what’s there.
By using the predefined reports, we’ve been able to expand the
width and breadth of questions that people are
asking."
Obright has found that bringing in predefined
and easy-to-use BI has helped the executives define trends for
themselves and use that to better focus volunteers and
staff.
"For instance, our president or CEO would be
talking to a volunteer in Toronto — the question before might
have been, ‘How is your membership? I don’t really know your
numbers, so how is it going?’ Now it’s, ‘I can see you’re
doing well in the western half, but not the eastern half. How
can we help?’"
That’s just scratching the surface,
Obright said. He is now getting questions from council
directors who may not be very technically literate, but are
tinkering with the data and setting predefined views for
themselves.
Mike Schiff, vice-president data
warehousing and business intelligence for Sterling, Va.-based
Current Analysis Inc., said this is all based on the idea that
you cannot get IT involved with everything they need.
"You’ve got to empower business users, casual users if
you will, with the ability to generate their own analyses and
reports," Schiff said. "It’s more the democratization of BI
that is taking place."
Empowered business users are no
longer an anomaly. Guy Hudon, vice-president of business
development for Montreal-based Odesia Solutions, a data
warehouse shop, said people do not want to have to call IT to
change a dashboard or metric; they want to do it themselves.
Tools that allow them to do that are what enterprises are
looking for.
"If the original focus was wanting to do
dashboarding and the ability to do some drilling down, now we
see users want to view the dashboards, query the data, analyze
it and go through the reporting," Hudon
said.
Dashboards, like those in a car, offer basic data
about a particular event or series of events. They will give
results to a particular query, though not necessarily show why
something occurred.
Vendors seem happy to fulfill the
desires of the more BI-savvy end user. SAS, PeopleSoft, SAP,
Cognos and others have all announced a focus on tools more
easily accessible to the less technical user.
Recent
consolidation of the BI market is allowing companies such as
Business Objects — which bought Crystal Decisions — to focus
even more on the casual user.
Darren Cunningham, group
manager for the data integration product line at San Jose,
Calif.-based Business Objects, said ease of use is always
going to be a huge selling point for BI. "The fear factor is
being reduced."
No longer are results measured by a
couple of people in the back office or a few executives on a
portal, says Michael Corcoran, vice-president and chief
communications officer for New York-based Information Builders
Inc.
A year ago, Corcoran said, the issue for BI was
how to put information in the customer’s hands while keeping
security in mind. "Now (vendors and enterprises) are racing to
provide more information to the customers."
The more
readily information is made available, the better off
enterprises will be, Corcoran said. "It’s when you put all
that information out there for users to see that they will go
and measure their own performance." They will start to answer
a lot of their own questions, he said, taking some of the
internal customer service angst away from the
enterprise.
"People have become so much more educated
and insightful about using these applications," he added.
"They figure out what you haven’t given them pretty quickly.
That’s a major change in philosophy from what data warehouses
were built for five to seven years ago."
With the
increased focus on the casual user and ease of use in the
tools, where will this leave the power user?
Clarke
said part of the plan for CPR has always been to put more
information and expertise into the hands of the business user
in order to free up the power user for more in-depth and more
predictive data mining. "But it’s a tough row to hoe, I’m
finding."
In the past, Clarke said, and to a certain
extent still today, the power user group spent a vast
proportion of time collecting and collating information prior
to producing anything. "We want to change the ratio of time
they spend collecting and reporting to
analyzing."
Current Analysis’s Schiff noted that people
with questions on the BI systems still need people to go to
for help. "If you’re a naïve user and you have a question, you
are either going to go to IT or the power user." However, the
easier to use tools mean that casual users will eventually
learn the techniques on their own and give the power user time
to be more productive.
"People won’t be taking the
power user to lunch that often anymore," Schiff
laughed.
Mackay said it’s unlikely that executives are
going to delve into a lot of detail and start writing their
own reports, but certainly IT and the power user need not be
called on for dashboards and scorecards anymore.
Power
users will be consulted for more complex data mining, Mackay
said, adding that they will continue to drive the tools and
technology as they change and grow.
The power users are
also the people that tend to love the tools and love pushing
them to their limits, seeing what they can do. They need more
than just a quick view into the data, Odesia’s Hudon said. "I
feel the power user layer will survive just
fine."
Cunningham agreed, saying the power user will
always be needed to crunch numbers and push things out to the
rest of the organization. "The role is just changing as end
users can and want to create more things on their
own."
Analysts creating sophisticated models and
reports may find that they are required to push that
information out more and more.
The days of executives
sitting at their desks without even a PC are gone, Schiff
said. "If you wanted information before others, you had to
know how to use a computer and the ’Net. It’s the same now
with reporting. If it’s simple enough, why bother
IT?"
|